Skip to main content

The Human character and its conditions

 The public death of God would mean that the responsibilities of Morality have been thrust onto barely informed people. We would have to Take on the mantle of God/Truth into our own hands.



we build
12:24
circuits within us for habitual action
12:28
that we've practiced many times that
12:31
seem to run in a very deterministic
12:32
fashion and we are a strange combination
12:35
of deterministic and non-deterministic
12:37
as far as I can tell but what our
12:40
consciousness seems to be for is to
12:42
encounter those things that we have not
12:45
yet encountered and those things that we
12:48
have not yet encountered seem to me to
12:50
be those things that have not yet been
12:52
brought into being and so you could say
12:55
that what our consciousness is for is
12:57
for the encounter with potential you
13:00
know that our consciousness is further
13:03
it's not for the past it's not even for
13:05
the present



Consciousness is to transform the future into the present

it
37:20
is the case that human beings have a
37:22
nature and and we have to contend with
37:24
that nature and so we can't just create
37:27
our own values and and what what young
37:30
especially you Freud started it but
37:33
especially you believed that well in
37:36
some sense what had happened was that we
37:38
had lost the externalized religious
37:40
narrative that had been projected by our
37:42
imagination out onto the world you know
37:45
you think about the the constellations
37:48
and and and the names of the
37:49
constellations and the idea that the
37:51
skies were populated by gods you know
37:54
that was an externalization of our
37:56
imagination right projected out into the
37:58
world we were seeing the world through
37:59
our imagination and which is exactly how
38:02
we do see the world and as we proceed
38:05
we're better able to distinguish let's
38:07
say what's imagination from what
38:09
subjective world but that doesn't mean
38:11
the imagination disappears or that it's
38:13
without value because the imagination is
38:16
part of what helps us let's say confront
38:18
the future because we do that with our
38:20
imagination and to compose things in
38:23
impossibility before we realize them in
38:26
actuality so for young the world of gods
38:29
just collapsed within back into the
38:32
imagination and it was into the
38:34
imagination that we had to go again to
38:36
discover what we had lost to discover
38:38
these lost values






we'd have to understand how it is that
14:35
our conscious choices and our conscious
14:37
ethical choices transform that
14:40
potentiality into actuality into reality
14:44
into the present in the past and we
14:47
certainly but we certainly act as if we
14:50
believe that that's what we do we
14:52
upgrade ourselves for example when we do
14:55
a bad job of it we're upset with our
14:57
children and those we love if we don't
14:59
believe that they're living up to their
15:00
potential we're guilty and ashamed when
15:03
we make choices that we feel are
15:05
inappropriate we understand to some
15:07
degree that the manner in which time
15:09
lays itself out has something to do with


15:12the ethics of our choice



that idea emphasized in
15:27
ancient religious stories such as those
15:30
that are outlined in Genesis or in
15:32
Genesis with it's strange insistence
15:34
that you know God is that which brings
15:38
order out of chaos
15:40
formless potential generates the world
15:43
out of formless potential and that were
15:45
somehow made in that image which which
15:48
seems to me to be the case and at the
15:50
proper way by the way to go about acting
15:54
in that image is to act in relationship
15:58
to the potential that confronts you with
16:01
truth and with courage with careful
16:04
articulation that's the logos and that
16:07
if you do that then what you bring forth
16:09
is is good





a pretty good that that idea
27:05
that there's something divine let's say
27:07
that resides within you of ultimate
27:09
worth even as a philosophical statement
27:13
or a psychological statement rather than
27:15
a metaphysical statement it seems to be
27:17
a precondition for establishing properly
27:20
harmonious relationships with yourself





The Club of Rome coining the idea that (Overpopulation, privation, starvation; as human beings are cancerous to the planet) by year 2000, but  Julian Simon vs. Paul Ehrlich argued— would the Earth run out of natural resources to sustain an ever-growing population
The human question is not how many can possibly survive within the system, but what kind of existence is possible for those who do survive. -Frank Herbert









would say something about the
88:13
burns are still healing you know I mean
88:16
Nietzsche said that you could tell much
88:20
about a man's character by how much
88:23
truth he could tolerate which is very
88:27
interesting you know there's not an idea
88:30
in in in the in the great western
88:33
tradition that the truth is the way and
88:35
the path of life and and that no one
88:38
comes to the Father except through the
88:40
truth and and I believe that to be the
88:43
case because I don't think that you can
88:45
manifest who you are without the truth
88:48
and so I think it's it's it's literally
88:51
and metaphorically truth that the the
88:53
pathway to who you could be if you were
88:57
completely who you were is through the
89:00
truth and I would say and so the truth
89:04
does set you free but the problem is is
89:06
that it destroys everything that isn't
89:08
worthy in you as it sets you free and
89:11
that's that's a process of burning and
89:15
and and it's it's painful because you
89:19
cling to what you shouldn't be partly
89:22
out of pride and partly out of ignorance
89:23
and partly out of laziness and and and
89:27
so then you encounter something true 


and
89:29
you all know this you all know this
89:31
well because when was the last time that
89:34
you learned something important that
89:35
wasn't a blow of some sort 




you know it's
89:40
often you look back at your life and you
89:41
think oh god I really learned something
89:44
there I wouldn't want to do that again
89:45
but it really changed my life I mean
89:47
sometimes it can really destroy you you
89:49
know an encounter with the truth and you
89:50
never really recover but now and then
89:53
something comes along and straightens
89:55
you out and a lot of you has to go a law
89:58
to you has to burn away you know and and
90:00
and I suppose in some sense the idea is
90:03
that everything about you that isn't
90:04
worthy, is to be put into the flames and
90:09
that's that's another reason to be not
90:14
so casual about claiming what you
90:17
believe —because it isn't something that
90:21
you undertake with oh due caution 





you
90:26
know I learned when I was kid about 25
90:29
or so little older than a kid that
90:33
almost everything that I said was one
90:36
form of lie or another and I wasn't any
90:40
worse I would say that the people that I
90:44
was associating with or any better and
90:46
and the lies were manifold you know they
90:49
were attempts to win arguments for the
90:52
sake of winning the argument that might
90:54
be one attempts to indicate my
90:59
intellectual prowess when there were
91:01
competitions of that sort maybe just the
91:04
the sheer pleasure of engaging in an
91:07
intact intellectual argument and winning
91:10
my inability to distinguish between
91:13
ideas that I had read and
91:16
incorporated because I had read but had
91:19
realized that I hadn't yet earned the
91:22
right to use all of that and you know I
91:25
had this experience that lasted a long
91:27
time while I would say it's really never
91:28
gone away,  and I think this was the
91:31
awakening of my conscience essentially
91:34
and I didn't realize that this until
91:37
much later when I was reading Socrates
91:39
apology this this voice for lack of a
91:43
better
91:44
made itself manifest inside me and it
91:48
said every time I said something that
91:51
wasn't true and that's usually what it
91:54
said— that's not true —you don't believe
91:57
that .....or there was a sensation that was
92:00
associated with it I don't think this is
92:02
that uncommon you know I asked my
92:04
psychology classes for many years in a
92:06
row if they hadn't experienced this
92:10
experience that they had a voice in
92:12
their head let's say it's a metaphor or
92:15
a feeling that communicated to them when
92:20
they were about to do something wrong



and it was universally the case that
92:27
people agreed with one of those
92:28
statements or another and the other
92:30
thing I would ask is well do you always
92:32
listen to it and of course the answer to
92:34
that was definitely no —but that's also
92:36
very interesting you know that you can
92:38
have this faculty this conscience this
92:41
seems to me to be very tightly
92:43
associated with the idea of free will is
92:45
that you can have this internal voice
92:48
this Damon
92:49
the root word for democracy



(oh yes I
92:51
didn't finish that story so the yes well
92:54
it's important well so Socrates Damon
92:56
told him it was his moral guide and
92:59
democracy appears to be predicated on
93:02
the idea that the polity will function
93:06
if people attend to their consciousness
93:10
that's the that's the that's the overlap
93:13
of those conceptualizations and that's
93:16
that that's it well first of all I think
93:18
that's the case you know and it makes a
93:21
certain amount of logical sense I mean
93:23
if we assume that the political state is
93:25
something like the emergent consequence
93:27
of the decisions of all its citizens we
93:30
would assume that the wiser the
93:33
decisions of the citizens the more
93:36
upright and functional the state)




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bredlik

 https://yeahwrite.me/writing-help-bredlik/ Bredlik isn’t as easy as it looks, folks. It’s a very tight form with very tight parameters. Technically bredlik is four lines (two rhyming couplets) in iambic tetrameter, or two stanzas of four lines each in iambic diameter with an ABCB rhyme scheme. The other thing that bredlik has going on is that the original poet took inspiration for the poem not only from the incident but from the fact that it happened in a re-enactor setting. So he used 18th century spellings (or reasonable facsimiles thereof) for some of the words.

7 WAYS for achieving your purpose

 CHOOSE YOUR DIRECTION make use of free will.   Jesus and the blind man. Why does Jesus ask him what he wants when it is obvious he want to see? Choose area (learning, marriage, finance, friendships) of importance to you, and make 3-10 goals. What measurable  and compelling goal is possible? Set the goal, and then you have the direction. Reticular activating system: it helps you find whatever you are focusing on.  E.g. Search for blue items. Okay, how many purple items are there? you don't know. Because you only focus on what you look for. Your brain gets excited and get power the moment it knows what direction it is about to take. Decide  your exact deadline when you will achieve it. Also, ascertain what you want to sacrifice . (time/money/patience/difficult situations) The price will be  "Where there is no vision, people perish"-Solomon  CHOOSE YOUR REASONS Do you have insight to yourself? Be a person of deep water, look deeper. Introspect. What...
  A quiet place Lit umbrella Empty at times At others Tripping with wires White light Once Bright burning flavescent Yellow and crumpling in its notes. Then the umbrella folds. Another takes its place. Life in the Dark Room.