Skip to main content

Unselfing

When the self comes into play, we can only focus on what matters most to us: what is most grounded within the self...is the self. How it is entangled in the world of matter, how it interacts with pain and emotions, where we want to feel most pleasant. That is the self that speaks. 

For existentialist writers like Sartre, the loss of God means that each individual must create their own values, with only their conscience to guide them. Murdoch thinks this is a false picture, both psychologically and metaphysically. Her view is that we can retain much of the conceptual structure that makes the concept of God intelligible by replacing the Judaeo-Christian idea of a person, God, with the concept of the Good.

According to most monotheistic religions, namely christianity, we are mitigating the self, or view the self as inherenly flawed, a broken version of perfection, which is God, a being abound with love. It neutralises or reframes the position of the self in a larger frame of perceived perfection. It is the fitting of an element into the awareness that it is but just a dispensable cog in a machine running perfectly. The incentive for the now newly christened cog to  perform it's function is the flippant threat that it is easily disposed if it does not follow the design of a greater purpose.

It seems to work, on the basis that the cog believed itself to be working in the machine. But that itself could bring about complications when we note that not everyone can see nor agree with the existence of the perfect machine it claims to be a part of. Or at the least, if there are enough cogs professing its existence, there would be a clear boundary formed by the in-group of 'machine believers' and the out-group of 'kafirs'. In this case, there would be a high possibility for  conflict that jeopardizes the purposes and all levels of health  in the interests of both parties. In order to exist in its best form, both parties would have to exist on a near perfect structure of segretation in terms of all kinds of Interaction, all the while being aware of each other. Nonetheless, many religions don't perform this way as one of their no.1 methods for survival is to cross boundaries for the conquering of foreign ideologies while integrating their version of religious discourse. Given the circumstances, it can be said that monotheistic religions with singular truth narratives incongruent with the pluralism of the world work to mitigate the self, as long as they dominate all narratives, or when they do not interact with any narrative whatsoever which will counteract the foundation of belief for the process of self-mitigation. 

On the other hand, the method of unselfing can be followed through without relying on an authoritative figure or grand narrative. Instead, it can be interpreted that the most important enactor of unselfing is the self. The responsibility lies within the pure incentive of being better at clearing internal and external desires instead of an external pressure of doctrine that requires devotion to authority. 

Iris Murdoch believes that unselfing is required for virtue, as it takes us out of our egoistic preoccupations, and connects us to the Good in the world. Love is a form of unselfing, illustrating how close attention to another, and the way they really are, again, takes us out of a narrow focus on the self. Though this view of love runs counter to a view that those in love often overlook flaws in their loved ones, or at least down-play them, I argue that it is compatible with Murdoch's view that love can overlook some flaws, ones that do not speak to the loved one's true self. Unselfing requires that we don't engage in selfish delusion, but a softer view of our loved ones is permitted.

To unself I simply turn my attention outward, away from myself and on to the world. If I do this successfully I will see things as they really are, and not through the lens of my own selfish concerns. 

Star this: experience of nature has a special role to play in making manifest to us the quality of consciousness that unselfing involves.

her novel The Bell states: ‘Love is the extremely difficult realisation that something other than oneself is real. Love, and so art and morals, is the discovery of reality.’

Like Plato, she assumes that goodness is a matter of truth-seeking, which is a way of bringing oneself into contact with reality. This requires patient attention to what is there, which again demands unselfing. You can see how she might think that the artist displays such attention - she thinks realism in art is a moral achievement.

https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/why-the-world-needs-iris-murdoch-s-philosophy-of-unselfing-1.3890900

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

7 WAYS for achieving your purpose

 CHOOSE YOUR DIRECTION make use of free will.   Jesus and the blind man. Why does Jesus ask him what he wants when it is obvious he want to see? Choose area (learning, marriage, finance, friendships) of importance to you, and make 3-10 goals. What measurable  and compelling goal is possible? Set the goal, and then you have the direction. Reticular activating system: it helps you find whatever you are focusing on.  E.g. Search for blue items. Okay, how many purple items are there? you don't know. Because you only focus on what you look for. Your brain gets excited and get power the moment it knows what direction it is about to take. Decide  your exact deadline when you will achieve it. Also, ascertain what you want to sacrifice . (time/money/patience/difficult situations) The price will be  "Where there is no vision, people perish"-Solomon  CHOOSE YOUR REASONS Do you have insight to yourself? Be a person of deep water, look deeper. Introspect. What...
  A quiet place Lit umbrella Empty at times At others Tripping with wires White light Once Bright burning flavescent Yellow and crumpling in its notes. Then the umbrella folds. Another takes its place. Life in the Dark Room.

Conflating the liberty of freedom and burden of choice, and finding the balance in between

"...the individual ceases to be himself; he adopts entirely the kind of personality offered to him by cultural patterns; and he therefore becomes exactly as all others are and as they expect him to be...The person who gives up his individual self and becomes an automaton, identical with millions of other automatons around him, need not feel alone and anxious any more. But the price he pays, however, is high; it is the loss of his self." -Escape From Freedom by Erich Fromm, first published by Holt, Rineheart and Winston, New York, 1941. http://www.alternativeinsight.com/Escape_from_freedom.html and then comes the question many strive to answer; what do we risk to lose when we are already in an individualised state of mind? Even more, i think. The attraction of the self makes it even harder to conform, whilst the pressure for conformity never ceases—in fact the pressure exponentially increases—staring you down through that bright screen all day and for most of the night. Freedo...