Skip to main content

Community? Seksan&Manoj

 MANOJ: The rise of community education in the anti-poaching movement 

Through:

  1. the instruction of political changes 
  2. Exposure to mainstream modernisation
  3. The rise of NGOs, infiltrating the sense of community by reshaping ideals and recalibrating new common purposes for the villagers.


They start learning humanity’s benefit from conservation, they begin evaluating the opportunity cost: eco-tourism as a venue to make a living.



SEKSAN: We first started this kebun with the heart to step out and helping ourselves attain the community we want. We are the components of this community, and we cannot wait to rely on people in power, or those with titles to help us. Some departments will take a lifetime before they follow through their promises to us. 


Don’t worry about community. Just start doing. When I started Kebun Bangsar a lot of people were teaching me about how to do engagement in communities, and i find that those were all very western ideas— within 1km u have to do this, within 2km u have to do something else, too much structural and intellectual shit going on. 


The idea is to just do it, and the community will form itself around the action. Don’t be too worried, as two people can be enough to start. The more important thing is to just begin. Initially we had no real ‘community’, there were children who were a part of the initiative, to learn and farm, but because of so much protest to start the kebun, they were taken away by their parents. But we started anyway. A year went by and we had some kids from the orphanage, but it wasn’t sustainable. Then the refugee kids came in, and they flourished and made the space their own. They came by themselves. When you have a project at this scale of purpose, the community will come. The momentum of your work will carry the project beyond your expectations and planning. Your efforts will evolve into something grander than yourself, and that is when we can say the community has adopted it. KongsiKL has also evolved so much from where we started, beyond its initial purpose as an incubation space. Because we really do not know when waves of opportunities will land and propel you in new directions in this spirit, you should begin the initiative first, create the platform, make it exist, then your community will flock and land on it.


But now, cutting through the initial ideas, I realise that initiatives like Kebun2 bangsar and kongsiKL are mainly about resources. You need to free up resources for people to use. Land, for example, is a major resource in the city, and Kebun2 Bangsar is about a piece of underutilised land given back to the local community for realistic and innovative use, to feed the underprivileged and teach locals how to prepare for potential food insecurity by growing their own produce.


KongsiKL is about a building— which is also a major resource for young people, because if they have to rent out a space for meaningful work, they won’t do it. If the space is free, they can experiment. The Klangriver Festival came up from the idea that there is a building that we can use and do something ourselves.


Basically the keyword is empowerment. It’s not so much about building a community for community’s sake. There is a purpose that creates the bond, and Dignity For CHildren embodies that ideal, they empower underprivileged kids through education,








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ABSURDISM, EXISTENTIALISM, FREE WILL, POSTMODERNISM

 After the war, Introduction The first world war threw society into a state of disillusionment, and a fracturing of the staunch belief in morals became prominent, sparking literary advancements that challenged romantic ideals, advocating for a new perception of stability and sensibilities. In the poem Gerontion by T.S. Elliot, the modernist stance of fragmentation and the pursuit of purpose lies in man’s actualization of himself. Meanwhile, Samuel Beckett’s waiting for Godot written in the post-war environment of World War II can be viewed as an attack on modernism, rejecting its ideological claims to legitimise purposeful meaning that interprets the world of Estragon and Vladimir with a Grand Existential Narrative . Nonetheless, both these arguments provide a post-war lens that views life without inherent importance nor singular purpose/essence, resulting in the rise of ‘absurdism’— a search for answers in a world that offers no true answer . In this essay, the aforementioned conc...

Bredlik

 https://yeahwrite.me/writing-help-bredlik/ Bredlik isn’t as easy as it looks, folks. It’s a very tight form with very tight parameters. Technically bredlik is four lines (two rhyming couplets) in iambic tetrameter, or two stanzas of four lines each in iambic diameter with an ABCB rhyme scheme. The other thing that bredlik has going on is that the original poet took inspiration for the poem not only from the incident but from the fact that it happened in a re-enactor setting. So he used 18th century spellings (or reasonable facsimiles thereof) for some of the words.

Manglish and its Cina Particles

"The ubiquitous word lah ( [lɑ́]   or   [lɑ̂] ), used at the end of a sentence, can also be described as a particle that simultaneously asserts a position and entices solidarity.  Note that 'lah' is often written after a space for clarity, but there is never a pause before it. This is because originally in Malay, 'lah' is appended to the end of the word and is not a separate word by itself." SNEAKING SUSPICION: "lah" was originally from the Cantonese practicing south of China. The land of Malaya had relations with China since the Ming dynasty, when China was the protector of the Malaccan Sultanate (maybe even from the 5th-6th century), and the use of la as a sentence-suffix particle got integrated into the Malay language its formation, probably during the second phase is Early Modern Malay (1500-ca. 1850) that witnessed the indigenization of Arabic loan words, changes in the affix system, and a rather liberal word order.  Confirmation alternatives: ...