Skip to main content

extraordinary evidence

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If I tell you I bought a pizza last night, you can probably take my word for it, and if you really wanted to check, I could provide a receipt. However, if I claim I can fly to the moon with my farts, you should demand more evidence before believing it. When it comes to claims about God, we apply the same level of scrutiny as we do to any other supernatural claim. Until there is compelling evidence to support the existence of God or even better, justify worship, we will continue to seek naturalistic explanations. Every phenomenon in the universe thus far has had a naturalistic explanation, and there is no evidence of anything supernatural ever occurring.

Pragmatically, the approach outlined by Forest is the most practical. Without it, you'd be overwhelmed by irrational beliefs, like the floor being lava or oxygen being lethal because of Bigfoot. Accepting claims without evidence leads to believing problematic and contradictory things, which can be harmful. Ultimately, the standard Forest and I are advocating is the one everyone uses in daily life. For example, if your car doesn't start, you don't assume it's because of dinosaurs or unicorns; you consider practical causes like a flat tire or an empty gas tank. Are you following along with us?

source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=polKLkYux6E 


Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence: 
  • Everyday claims, like buying a pizza, require minimal evidence and are easily believable.
  • Extraordinary claims, such as flying to the moon by unconventional means, require substantial evidence before they can be accepted.
  • This principle is applied to supernatural claims, including the existence of God, which should be supported by strong evidence before belief or worship is justified.
  • Historically, all observed phenomena have had natural explanations, and there is no verified evidence of supernatural events.
Practical and Rational Approach to Belief:
  • Applying skepticism and seeking evidence is the most practical approach to understanding the world.
  • Accepting claims without evidence leads to irrational and potentially harmful beliefs.
  • In everyday situations, people rely on logical and evidence-based reasoning (e.g., diagnosing car problems), not on fantastical explanations.
  • This rational standard should be consistently applied to all claims, ensuring that beliefs are grounded in reality and evidence.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

ABSURDISM, EXISTENTIALISM, FREE WILL, POSTMODERNISM

 After the war, Introduction The first world war threw society into a state of disillusionment, and a fracturing of the staunch belief in morals became prominent, sparking literary advancements that challenged romantic ideals, advocating for a new perception of stability and sensibilities. In the poem Gerontion by T.S. Elliot, the modernist stance of fragmentation and the pursuit of purpose lies in man’s actualization of himself. Meanwhile, Samuel Beckett’s waiting for Godot written in the post-war environment of World War II can be viewed as an attack on modernism, rejecting its ideological claims to legitimise purposeful meaning that interprets the world of Estragon and Vladimir with a Grand Existential Narrative . Nonetheless, both these arguments provide a post-war lens that views life without inherent importance nor singular purpose/essence, resulting in the rise of ‘absurdism’— a search for answers in a world that offers no true answer . In this essay, the aforementioned conc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Bredlik

 https://yeahwrite.me/writing-help-bredlik/ Bredlik isn’t as easy as it looks, folks. It’s a very tight form with very tight parameters. Technically bredlik is four lines (two rhyming couplets) in iambic tetrameter, or two stanzas of four lines each in iambic diameter with an ABCB rhyme scheme. The other thing that bredlik has going on is that the original poet took inspiration for the poem not only from the incident but from the fact that it happened in a re-enactor setting. So he used 18th century spellings (or reasonable facsimiles thereof) for some of the words.
Post a Comment
Read more

Manglish and its Cina Particles

"The ubiquitous word lah ( [lɑ́]   or   [lɑ̂] ), used at the end of a sentence, can also be described as a particle that simultaneously asserts a position and entices solidarity.  Note that 'lah' is often written after a space for clarity, but there is never a pause before it. This is because originally in Malay, 'lah' is appended to the end of the word and is not a separate word by itself." SNEAKING SUSPICION: "lah" was originally from the Cantonese practicing south of China. The land of Malaya had relations with China since the Ming dynasty, when China was the protector of the Malaccan Sultanate (maybe even from the 5th-6th century), and the use of la as a sentence-suffix particle got integrated into the Malay language its formation, probably during the second phase is Early Modern Malay (1500-ca. 1850) that witnessed the indigenization of Arabic loan words, changes in the affix system, and a rather liberal word order.  Confirmation alternatives: ...
Post a Comment
Read more