Skip to main content

Evolution 🧬

 I can’t really blame people for not accepting evolution. Obviously, many never researched it and simply don’t want to—but I get it.

It’s deeply uncomfortable. Evolution doesn’t grant us a divine origin story. It says we’re here due to random mutations, environmental pressures, and a long series of accidents. We’re not the center of the universe—we're just another branch on the tree of life. That kind of perspective demands you let go of the idea that you’re cosmically chosen or inherently special.

And yet, paradoxically, religion often plays both sides. It tells us we’re made in the image of God—beloved, chosen, eternal. But at the same time, it tells us we’re broken, fallen, inherently sinful, in need of saving. That we are nothing without grace. So even the supposed affirmation is laced with dependence and guilt. You're exalted, but only conditionally.

No matter how intelligent or open-minded you are, these ideas get buried deep. They shape the way you see yourself and your place in the world, and unlearning them is hard.

But the evidence for evolution is overwhelming—if you care to look. And in some ways, accepting that you’re not cosmically significant can be liberating. It creates space for responsibility, for present-moment meaning. If this life is all there is, then what you do with it becomes deeply important—not for heaven or hell, but for here and now.

And none of this disproves a creator. It only challenges the human-shaped gods we’ve imagined to comfort ourselves. Maybe something did set it all in motion—but if so, it likely isn’t the insecure, tribal, and controlling version found in many scriptures.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ABSURDISM, EXISTENTIALISM, FREE WILL, POSTMODERNISM

 After the war, Introduction The first world war threw society into a state of disillusionment, and a fracturing of the staunch belief in morals became prominent, sparking literary advancements that challenged romantic ideals, advocating for a new perception of stability and sensibilities. In the poem Gerontion by T.S. Elliot, the modernist stance of fragmentation and the pursuit of purpose lies in man’s actualization of himself. Meanwhile, Samuel Beckett’s waiting for Godot written in the post-war environment of World War II can be viewed as an attack on modernism, rejecting its ideological claims to legitimise purposeful meaning that interprets the world of Estragon and Vladimir with a Grand Existential Narrative . Nonetheless, both these arguments provide a post-war lens that views life without inherent importance nor singular purpose/essence, resulting in the rise of ‘absurdism’— a search for answers in a world that offers no true answer . In this essay, the aforementioned conc...

7 WAYS for achieving your purpose

 CHOOSE YOUR DIRECTION make use of free will.   Jesus and the blind man. Why does Jesus ask him what he wants when it is obvious he want to see? Choose area (learning, marriage, finance, friendships) of importance to you, and make 3-10 goals. What measurable  and compelling goal is possible? Set the goal, and then you have the direction. Reticular activating system: it helps you find whatever you are focusing on.  E.g. Search for blue items. Okay, how many purple items are there? you don't know. Because you only focus on what you look for. Your brain gets excited and get power the moment it knows what direction it is about to take. Decide  your exact deadline when you will achieve it. Also, ascertain what you want to sacrifice . (time/money/patience/difficult situations) The price will be  "Where there is no vision, people perish"-Solomon  CHOOSE YOUR REASONS Do you have insight to yourself? Be a person of deep water, look deeper. Introspect. What...

Bredlik

 https://yeahwrite.me/writing-help-bredlik/ Bredlik isn’t as easy as it looks, folks. It’s a very tight form with very tight parameters. Technically bredlik is four lines (two rhyming couplets) in iambic tetrameter, or two stanzas of four lines each in iambic diameter with an ABCB rhyme scheme. The other thing that bredlik has going on is that the original poet took inspiration for the poem not only from the incident but from the fact that it happened in a re-enactor setting. So he used 18th century spellings (or reasonable facsimiles thereof) for some of the words.