Skip to main content

The cleanliness formula

 You can formalize your idea as a simple multi-variable optimization / balance equation that fits nicely into existing frameworks like utility theory or decision theory.



---


Define variables


Let:


 = effort exerted to clean oneself


 = internal (subjective/physiological) feeling of cleanliness


 = actual (objective) cleanliness level


 = perceived cleanliness (social/interpersonal)




---


Core idea: maximize “cleanliness utility”


You’re essentially describing a trade-off, so we can express it as a utility function:


U(E) = w_1 I(E) + w_2 A(E) + w_3 P(E) - w_4 E


Where:


 are weights (importance of each factor)


 are all functions of effort 




---


Interpretation


Increasing effort generally increases:


: you feel cleaner


: you are cleaner


: others perceive you as cleaner



But with diminishing returns, e.g.:



I'(E), A'(E), P'(E) > 0 \quad \text{and} \quad I''(E), A''(E), P''(E) < 0


And excessive effort has a cost:


time, energy, skin damage, etc.





---


Optimal condition


The “correct extent” (your original idea) is when:


\frac{dU}{dE} = w_1 I'(E) + w_2 A'(E) + w_3 P'(E) - w_4 = 0


This means:


> You should clean yourself up to the point where the marginal benefit of cleanliness equals the marginal cost of effort.





---


Conceptual translation of your sentence


“To bathe or not to bathe excessively” becomes:


> Choose such that total perceived + actual + internal cleanliness gains are balanced against the effort cost.





---


If you want a more philosophical / compact form


\text{Optimal Cleanliness} = \arg\max_E \left[ \text{Internal} + \text{Actual} + \text{Social} - \text{Effort} \right]



---


If you want, I can extend this into a named “theory” (like a mock academic framework) or map it to something like behavioral economics or hygiene psychology.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ABSURDISM, EXISTENTIALISM, FREE WILL, POSTMODERNISM

 After the war, Introduction The first world war threw society into a state of disillusionment, and a fracturing of the staunch belief in morals became prominent, sparking literary advancements that challenged romantic ideals, advocating for a new perception of stability and sensibilities. In the poem Gerontion by T.S. Elliot, the modernist stance of fragmentation and the pursuit of purpose lies in man’s actualization of himself. Meanwhile, Samuel Beckett’s waiting for Godot written in the post-war environment of World War II can be viewed as an attack on modernism, rejecting its ideological claims to legitimise purposeful meaning that interprets the world of Estragon and Vladimir with a Grand Existential Narrative . Nonetheless, both these arguments provide a post-war lens that views life without inherent importance nor singular purpose/essence, resulting in the rise of ‘absurdism’— a search for answers in a world that offers no true answer . In this essay, the aforementioned conc...

7 WAYS for achieving your purpose

 CHOOSE YOUR DIRECTION make use of free will.   Jesus and the blind man. Why does Jesus ask him what he wants when it is obvious he want to see? Choose area (learning, marriage, finance, friendships) of importance to you, and make 3-10 goals. What measurable  and compelling goal is possible? Set the goal, and then you have the direction. Reticular activating system: it helps you find whatever you are focusing on.  E.g. Search for blue items. Okay, how many purple items are there? you don't know. Because you only focus on what you look for. Your brain gets excited and get power the moment it knows what direction it is about to take. Decide  your exact deadline when you will achieve it. Also, ascertain what you want to sacrifice . (time/money/patience/difficult situations) The price will be  "Where there is no vision, people perish"-Solomon  CHOOSE YOUR REASONS Do you have insight to yourself? Be a person of deep water, look deeper. Introspect. What...

Manglish and its Cina Particles

"The ubiquitous word lah ( [lɑ́]   or   [lɑ̂] ), used at the end of a sentence, can also be described as a particle that simultaneously asserts a position and entices solidarity.  Note that 'lah' is often written after a space for clarity, but there is never a pause before it. This is because originally in Malay, 'lah' is appended to the end of the word and is not a separate word by itself." SNEAKING SUSPICION: "lah" was originally from the Cantonese practicing south of China. The land of Malaya had relations with China since the Ming dynasty, when China was the protector of the Malaccan Sultanate (maybe even from the 5th-6th century), and the use of la as a sentence-suffix particle got integrated into the Malay language its formation, probably during the second phase is Early Modern Malay (1500-ca. 1850) that witnessed the indigenization of Arabic loan words, changes in the affix system, and a rather liberal word order.  Confirmation alternatives: ...